Robert Charles High Audit (2023) – A Scam or Legit Broker?

brokercomplaints
brokercomplaints
15 Min Read

Robert Charles High  – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.

Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Robert Charles High.

The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet

BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Robert Charles High. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.

 

About Robert High

Robert Charles High is an Investment Adviser. Robert Charles High’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 4568165 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/4568165.

Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Robert Charles High.

Robert Charles High has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.

 

Accusations and Disclosures

You can find below, a quick snapshot of Robert Charles High’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.

 

DISCLOSURE 1 – 

 

  • Event Date: 5/10/2022
  • Disclosure Type: Regulatory
  • Disclosure Resolution: Pending
  • Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA:
  • Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Allegations: The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 against Robert Charles High, II ( espondent\ or \High\). After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that, on February 22, 2021, Respondent pleaded guilty to one count of Attempted Fraudulent Schemes and Artifices in violation of Ariz. Rev. Stat. \u00a7\u00a7 13-1001 and 13-2310, and one count of theft in violation of Ariz. Rev. Stat. \u00a7 13-1802 before the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa in State of Arizona vs. Robert Charles High, II, CR2019-006501-001. On March 30, 2021, Sentencing Order was entered against High. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two and one half years with restitution for all economic loss to all victims. The counts of the indictment to which High pleaded guilty alleged, among other things that Respondent engaged in a scheme or artifice to defraud one of his clients out of a benefit in excess of $100,000, by means of fraudulent pretenses, representation, promises, or material omissions, and that he knowingly converted the client’s money. As a result of High’s agreement to plead guilty, the fraudulent scheme charge was amended to an attempt. The theft count remained unchanged.
  • Sanction Details ::
See also  Matthew Roger Quinn Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

 


 

DISCLOSURE 2 – 

 

  • Event Date: 3/25/2019
  • Disclosure Type: Regulatory
  • Disclosure Resolution: Final
  • Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 2019061677901
  • DocketNumberAAO: 2019061677901
  • Initiated By: FINRA
  • Allegations: Respondent High failed to respond to FINRA request for information.
  • Resolution: Letter
  • Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
  • Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: All capacities
  • Duration: Indefinite
  • Start Date: 6/28/2019
  • Regulator Statement: Pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552(h) and in accordance with FINRA’s Notice of Suspension and Suspension from Association letters dated March 25, 2019, and April 18, 2019, respectively, on June 28, 2019, High is barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities. Respondent failed to request termination of his suspension within three months of the date of the Notice of Suspension; therefore, he is automatically barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities.

 


 

DISCLOSURE 3 – 

 

  • Event Date: 3/14/2019
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Settled
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
  • Damage Amount Requested: $146,000.00
  • Settlement Amount: $145,827.22
  • Arbitration Docket Number:
See also  F. G Mckeel Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

 


 

DISCLOSURE 4 – 

 

  • Event Date: 2/20/2019
  • Disclosure Type: Employment Separation After Allegations
  • Disclosure Resolution:
  • Disclosure Detail :: Firm Name: FIRST FINANCIAL EQUITY CORPORATION
  • Termination Type: Discharged
  • Allegations: VIOLATION OF FIRM’S POLICIES

 


 

DISCLOSURE 5 – 

 

  • Event Date: 2/14/2019
  • Disclosure Type: Investigation
  • Disclosure Resolution:
  • Disclosure Detail :: Initiated By: FBI
  • Description of Investigation: POTENTIAL FORGERY/ MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS

 


 

DISCLOSURE 6 – 

 

  • Event Date: 6/24/2013
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Settled
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES MISREPRESENTATION REGARDING MANAGED ACCOUNT INVESTMENT. ACTIVITY DATES 11/23/2007-11/23/2007.
  • Damage Amount Requested: $60,000.00
  • Settlement Amount: $4,326.44
  • Broker Comment: FINRA HAS ADVISED TO PUT SETTLEMENT DETAILS ON THIS ID, AND TO REFERENCE FILE ID 1662519 AS A DUPLICATE FILED IN ERROR.

 


 

DISCLOSURE 7 – 

 

  • Event Date: 2/22/2012
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Closed-No Action
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES MISREPRESENTATION REGARDING VARIABLE ANNUITY INVESTMENT. ACTIVITY DATES 02/15/2012-02/17/2012.
  • Damage Amount Requested: $8,768.04
  • Arbitration Docket Number:

 


 

DISCLOSURE 8 – 

 

  • Event Date: 8/21/2011
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Settled
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES FAILURE TO FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING VARIABLE ANNUITY INVESTMENT. ACTIVITY DATES 05/25/2011-05/25/2011.
  • Damage Amount Requested: $31,000.00
  • Settlement Amount: $28,883.00
  • Arbitration Docket Number:

 


 

DISCLOSURE 9 – 

 

  • Event Date: 7/29/2011
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Denied
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES FORGERY RELATED TO A VARIABLE ANNUITY. ACTIVITY DATES 05/28/2011-05/28/2011.
  • Arbitration Docket Number:

 


 

DISCLOSURE 10 – 

 

  • Event Date: 7/29/2011
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Denied
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES FORGERY RELATED TO A VARIABLE ANNUITY. ACTIVITY DATES 07/29/2011-07/29/2011.
  • Arbitration Docket Number:

 


 

According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.

See also  Michael P Iammarino Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.

 

Previous Associations

Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.

 

  • FIRST FINANCIAL EQUITY CORPORATION (CRD#: 16507) :: 4/10/2012 – 2/20/2019 :: SCOTTSDALE, AZ
  • CHASE INVESTMENT SERVICES CORP. (CRD#: 25574) :: 7/6/2005 – 4/12/2012 :: MESA, AZ
  • BANC ONE SECURITIES CORPORATION (CRD#: 16999) :: 1/28/2005 – 7/6/2005 :: CHICAGO, IL
  • BANC ONE SECURITIES CORPORATION (CRD#: 16999) :: 11/24/2003 – 1/27/2005 :: CHICAGO, IL
  • EDWARD JONES (CRD#: 250) :: 9/24/2002 – 10/1/2003 :: ST. LOUIS, MO

 

The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.

Robert Charles High

 

Legit or Not?

Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Robert Charles High, but not limited to)  can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.

Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli

Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.

See also  Philip Michael Hanna Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –

  • Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
  • Unauthorized Trading
  • Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
  • Excessive Trading (Churning)
  • Lack of Diversification
  • Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
  • Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
  • Front Running of Transactions
  • Breakpoint Sale Violations
  • Negligent Portfolio Management

Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet. 

 

How to Protect Yourself

We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.

 

Robert Charles High

 

Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –

  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
  • Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
  • Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
  • Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
  • Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
  • Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
See also  Curtis Lynn Stutheit Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

 

Report Robert High

In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.

Robert Charles High – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.

Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →

This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:

  • Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
  • The CRD number (4568165) for the broker – Robert Charles High
  • Your complete contact information.

Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint.  Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.

Share this Article
Leave a comment