Padraig Conrad Mcglynn – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Padraig Conrad Mcglynn.
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Padraig Conrad Mcglynn. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About Padraig Mcglynn
Padraig Conrad Mcglynn is an Investment Adviser. Padraig Conrad Mcglynn’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2983783 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/2983783.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Padraig Conrad Mcglynn.
Padraig Conrad Mcglynn has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of Padraig Conrad Mcglynn’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 10/6/2006
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 03-06048
- DocketNumberAAO: 03-06048
- Initiated By: NASD
- Allegations: RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO AN NASD REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
- Resolution: Other
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Suspension
- Sanction Details: PURSUANT TO ARTICLE VI, SECTION 3 OF NASD BY-LAWS, AND NASD RULE 9554, RESPONDENT’S NASD REGISTRATION IS SUSPENDED OCTOBER 6, 2006 FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH AN ARBITRATION AWARD OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ARBITRATION CASE #03-06048 OR TO SATISFACTORILY RESPOND TO AN NASD REQUEST TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 8/20/2003
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Award / Judgment
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLAIMANTS ASSERTED THE FOLLOWING CAUSES OF ACTION: FRAUD; NEGLIGENT ACTIVITY; MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION, AND OMISSION OF FACTS.
- Damage Amount Requested: $1,714,500.00
- Arbitration Claim Filed Detail: 03-06048
- Arbitration Docket Number:
DISCLOSURE 3 –
- Event Date: 2/12/2003
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: C8A030014
- DocketNumberAAO: 8030014
- Initiated By: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC.
- Allegations: NASD CONDUCT RULE 2110 – MCGLYNN PREPARED, SIGNED AND FORWARED TO A PUBLIC CUSTOMER A LETTER WITH AN ENCLOSED DOCUMENT THAT MCGLYNN REFERRED TO AS A TEMPORARY CONFIRMATION. PRIOR TO SENDING THE LETTER, MCGLYNN USED A COMPUTER TO CREATE WHAT APPEARED TO BE A LETTERHEAD FOR A COMPANY UNRELATED TO HIS MEMBER FIRM WHICH HE PLACED AT THE TOP OF THE LETTER AND THE TEMPRORARY CONFIRMATION. THE TEMPORARY CONFIRMATION FALSELY REPRESENTED THAT THE CUSTOMER HAD AGREED TO PURCHASE SHARES OF STOCK AND THAT SHARES HAD BEEN PURCHASED FOR THE CUSTOMER THROUGH HIS MEMBER FIRM WHEN IN FACT THE CUSTOMER HAD NOT AGREED TO SUCH A PURCHASE, MCGLYNN HAD NOT PLACED AN ORDER TO PURCHASE THE SHARES FOR THE CUSTOMER AND NO SUCH TRANSACTION HAD TAKEN PLACE.
- Resolution: Decision
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar
- Sanction Details: DEFAULT DECISION RENDERED ON MAY 20, 2003, WHEREIN RESPONDENT IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY NASD MEMBER FIRM IN ANY CAPACITY (FOR SENDING FALSE DOCUMENTS TO A CUSTOMER, IN VIOLATION OF NASD CONDUCT RULE 2110). IF NO FURTHER ACTION, DECISION WILL BECOME FINAL JUNE 18, 2003. THE DECISION IS NOW FINAL.
DISCLOSURE 4 –
- Event Date: 11/22/2002
- Disclosure Type: Civil
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: Initiated By: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Allegations: SEC LITIGATION RELEASE 17857, NOVEMBER 22, 2002; THE COMMISSION BRINGS THIS ACTION TO STOP DEFENDANTS FROM CONTINUING TO DEFRAUD THE INVESTING PUBLIC THROUGH A PRIVATE OFFERING OF CONVERTIBLE, \PREFERRED \ STOCK SUPPOSEDLY ISSUED BY HIS FIRM (THE \OFFERING\). SINCE APRIL 2002, DEFENDANTS ILLICITLY INDUCED AT LEAST 32 PERSONS TO INVEST MORE THAN $2.5 MILLION IN THE OFFERING THROUGH: (A) PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF A PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (THE \OFFERING MEMORANDUM\) THAT CONTAINS MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMITTED MATERIAL FACTS CONCERNING THE FIRM, INCLUDING THE FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THAT THE FIRM WAS NOT LEGALLY AUTHORIZED TO SELL PREFERRED STOCK AT ALL; AND (B) ORAL MISREPRESENTATIONS BY BROKERS EMPLOYED AT THE FIRM?S SUBSIDIARY, INCLUDING FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING A SUPPOSEDLY IMMINENT IPO OF THE FIRM STOCK AND FALSE GUARANTEES CONCERNING THE PRICE AT WHICH INVESTORS WOULD BE ABLE TO RESELL THEIR STOCK. BECAUSE THE OFFERING IS SUPPOSED TO RAISE AS MUCH AS $5.1 MILLION, THE OFFERING REPRESENTS AN ONGOING THREAT TO THE INVESTING PUBLIC.
- Resolution: Judgment Rendered
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Injunction
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- THOMAS FLETCHER & COMPANY, INC. (CRD#: 43675) :: 2/4/2002 – 6/18/2003 :: NEW YORK, NY
- MAXIM GROUP LLC (CRD#: 120708) :: 12/6/2002 – 1/9/2003 :: NEW YORK, NY
- PRIMEX (CRD#: 29394) :: 7/25/2001 – 11/28/2001 :: NEW YORK, NY
- PARKER FINANCIAL CORP. (CRD#: 42140) :: 5/31/2001 – 6/13/2001 :: VALLEY COTTAGE, NY
- ARGUS SECURITIES, INC. (CRD#: 7400) :: 4/11/2001 – 6/8/2001 :: HALLANDALE, FL
- THE MINNEAPOLIS COMPANY, INC. (CRD#: 38859) :: 9/8/1998 – 12/1/1998 :: MELVILLE, NY
- FLETCHER AND FARADAY, INC. (CRD#: 29769) :: 12/10/1997 – 6/11/1998 :: HEMPSTEAD, NY
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Padraig Conrad Mcglynn, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report Padraig Mcglynn
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
Padraig Conrad Mcglynn – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (2983783) for the broker – Padraig Conrad Mcglynn
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.