Martin William Pernoll Audit (2023) – A Scam or Legit Broker?

14 Min Read

Martin William Pernoll  – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.

Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Martin William Pernoll.

The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet is currently investigating allegations related to Martin William Pernoll. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.


About Martin Pernoll

Martin William Pernoll is an Investment Adviser. Martin William Pernoll’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2094844 and the FINRA Profile can be found at –

Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Martin William Pernoll.

Martin William Pernoll has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.


Accusations and Disclosures

You can find below, a quick snapshot of Martin William Pernoll’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.




  • Event Date: 10/16/2017
  • Disclosure Type: Regulatory
  • Disclosure Resolution: Final
  • Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 2014040362101
  • DocketNumberAAO: 2014040362101
  • Initiated By: FINRA
  • Allegations: Without admitting or denying the findings, Pernoll consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he made false statements on attestation forms used to approve three fraudulent wire transfer requests that sought disbursement of customer funds to third-party accounts resulting in false entries in the books and records of his member firm. The findings stated that a hacker illegally gained access to the personal email account of an individual authorized to request transactions in the account of the customer and sent the firm three the requests and letters of authorization for disbursements of more than $88,000 from the customer’s account. Pernoll approved the disbursements and signed three attestation forms required by the firm’s clearing firm to process third-party wire distributions. Pernoll falsely stated on these forms that he had verbally confirmed with the customer the authenticity of the wire request instructions and had authenticated the customer’s signature on the letters of authorization. Pernoll did not actually take either of these actions. Because the firm was required to maintain these forms in connection with its business, these false statements created false books and records. In addition, the firm’s clearing firm processed the wire requests and disbursed the customer’s funds to different third-party accounts. The findings also stated that to process the requests, Pernoll effected two unsolicited sale transactions of stock and mutual fund shares in the customer’s account to create available cash of approximately $59,000. The customer did not have a discretionary account at the firm. Pernoll, nonetheless, effected the two transactions without discussing them with the customer or receiving the customer’s approval for them. The findings also included that Pernoll willfully failed to timely amend his Form U4 to disclose three customer-initiated, investment-related arbitrations and one civil judgment, and he willfully failed to amend his Form U4 to disclose a settlement in one of those three arbitrations. FINRA found that Pernoll allowed the firm to conduct a securities business while failing to maintain its required minimum net capital.
  • Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
  • Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Civil and Administrative Penalty(ies)/Fine(s)
  • Sanction Details :: Amount: $25,000.00 Sanctions: Suspension
  • Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: All Capacities
  • Duration: Nine months
  • Start Date: 10/16/2017
  • End Date: 7/15/2018
  • Sanctions: Pernoll understands that this settlement includes a finding that he willfully omitted to state material facts on a Form U4, and that under Section 3(a)(39)(F) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Article III, Section 4 of FINRA’s By-Laws, these omissions make him subject to a statutory disqualification with respect to association with a member.
See also  Alrex Uy Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?





  • Event Date: 4/19/2014
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Pending
  • Damage Amount Requested: $75,000.00
  • Arbitration Docket Number:





  • Event Date: 12/1/2013
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Settled
  • Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: SUITABILITY OF INVESTMENTS
  • Damage Amount Requested: $75,000.00
  • Settlement Amount: $35,000.00
  • Arbitration Docket Number:





  • Event Date: 5/1/2013
  • Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
  • Disclosure Resolution: Pending
  • Damage Amount Requested: $109,000.00
  • Arbitration Docket Number:



According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.

See also  Thomas H Hall Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.


Previous Associations

Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.


  • BAY MUTUAL FINANCIAL, LLC (CRD#: 130535) :: 9/20/2004 – 1/29/2016 :: SANTA MONICA, CA
  • WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC (CRD#: 19616) :: 7/1/2003 – 10/4/2004 :: ST. LOUIS, MO
  • PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7471) :: 3/22/2000 – 7/1/2003 :: NEW YORK, NY
  • DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. (CRD#: 7556) :: 5/18/1993 – 4/26/2000 :: PURCHASE, NY
See also  James Anthony Gentile Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?


The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.

Martin William Pernoll


Legit or Not?

Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Martin William Pernoll, but not limited to)  can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.

Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli

Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.

See also  Eric Scott Thomes Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?

There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –

  • Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
  • Unauthorized Trading
  • Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
  • Excessive Trading (Churning)
  • Lack of Diversification
  • Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
  • Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
  • Front Running of Transactions
  • Breakpoint Sale Violations
  • Negligent Portfolio Management

Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet. 


How to Protect Yourself

We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.


Martin William Pernoll


Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –

  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
  • Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
  • Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
  • Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
  • Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
  • Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
See also  Michael Jack Chapman Audit (2023) - A Scam or Legit Broker?


Report Martin Pernoll

In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.

Martin William Pernoll – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.

Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →

This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:

  • Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
  • The CRD number (2094844) for the broker – Martin William Pernoll
  • Your complete contact information.

Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint.  Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.

Share this Article
Leave a comment