James David Reisinger – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with James David Reisinger.
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to James David Reisinger. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About James Reisinger
James David Reisinger is an Investment Adviser. James David Reisinger’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 1275258 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/1275258.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for James David Reisinger.
James David Reisinger has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of James David Reisinger’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 10/10/2003
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: C8A030078
- DocketNumberAAO: 8030078
- Initiated By: NASD
- Allegations: NASD CONDUCT RULES 2110, 2210, 2310, AND 3010 – RESPONDENT REISINGER INVESTED CUSTOMERS ASSETS IN STOCK FUNDS FOR A PERIOD LONGER THAN 7 TO 11 DAYS WERE CONTRARY TO THE INSTRUCTIONS AND BEYOND THE SCOP OF AUTHORITY GRANTED TO REISINGER BY THE CUSTOMERS. THE COMPLAINT ALSO ALLEGES THAT REISINGER RECOMMENDED AND ENGAGED IN THE PURCHASE AND SALE TRANSACTIONS IN THE ACCOUNT OF CUSTOMERS, ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT HAVE REASONABLE GROUNDS FOR BELIEVING THAT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESULTANT TRANSACTIONS WERE SUITABLE FOR EACH OF THE CUSTOMERS ON THE BASIS OF THEIR AGE, NET WORTH, FINANCIAL SITUATION, INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE, AND NEEDS. IN ADDITION, REISINGER ALSO MOVED CUSTOMER FUNDS INTO AGGRESSIVE EQUITY MUTUAL FUNDS WITHOUT CUSTOMER KNOWLEDGE RO CONSENT. FURTHERMORE, REISINGER CREATED AND DISTRIBUTED A BROCHURE THAT TOUTED THE MARKET-TIMING PROGRAM HE DEVELOPED. REISINGER ALSO FAILED TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BY SIGNATURE OR INITIAL BY A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL OF THE MEMBE PRIOR TO THE USE OF THE BROCHURE, NOR WAS THE MATERIAL SENT TO NASD ADVERTISING REGULATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL WITHIN 10 DAYS OF FIRST USE. THE BROCHURE OMITTED MATERIAL INFORMATION NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS FOR EVALUATING THE FACTS REGARDING INVESTMENT PROGRAM. REISINGER ALSO PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED A LETTER THAT WAS DEFICIENT IN THE FOLLOWING RESPECTS: (A) THE MATERIAL DISCLOSURE: \PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS\ IS PLACED IN A LEGEND IN SMALLER TYPE IN THE LAST LINE ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE THREE-PAGE LETTER; (B) THE NAME OF THE NASD MEMBER WAS PLACED IN A LEGEND ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE LETTER; (C) THE LETTER, WHICH NAMES A NON-MEMBER ENTITY IN ADDITION TO THE MEMBER, FAILED TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT SECURITIES ARE OFFERED THROUGH THE MEMBER; AND (D) THE MATERIAL WAS NOT APPROVED PRIOR TO USE BY A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL OF THE BROKER-DEALER.
- Resolution: Decision
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent) Sanctions: Monetary Penalty other than Fines
- Regulator Statement: NAC DECISION RENDERED ON OCTOBER 18, 2005, WHEREIN THE HEARING PANEL DECISION WAS AFFIRMED AND RESPONDENTS MUST PAY $1,000 IN APPEAL COSTS AND $367.04 IN TRANSCRIPT COSTS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. RESPONDENT IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY NASD MEMBER FIRM IN ANY CAPACITY. A SEPARATE BAR WAS IMPOSED ON RESPONDENT FOR HIS UNSUITABILITY VIOLATIONS UNDER CONDUCT RULE 2310 AND FOR HIS UNAUTHORIZED TRADING VIOLATIONS UNDER CONDUCT RULE 2110. THIS DECISION BECAME FINAL ON NOVEMBER 20, 2005. FINE PAID. HEARING PANEL DECISION RENDERED ON MAY 25, 2004, WHEREIN JAMES REISINGER WAS FOUND TO HAVE USED DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO INVEST CLIENT FUNDS IN A MANNER THAT THE CLIENTS HAD NOT AUTHORIZED, AND THAT RESPONDENT REISINGER HAD NOT DETERMINED WAS SUITABLE FOR THE CLIENTS IN VIOLATION OF RULE 2110. RESPONDENT REISINGER IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY NASD MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY. IN ADDITION, RESPONDENT REISINGER IS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY ORDERED TO PAY COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,538.50.
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- EQUITAS AMERICA, LLC (CRD#: 39806) :: 4/19/2002 – 4/17/2003 :: FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
- ROYAL ALLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. (CRD#: 23131) :: 11/19/1989 – 4/22/2002 :: JERSEY CITY, NJ
- INTEGRATED RESOURCES EQUITY CORPORATION (CRD#: 6403) :: 11/20/1989 – 12/11/1989
- INTEGRATED RESOURCES EQUITY CORPORATION (CRD#: 6403) :: 2/3/1987 – 11/19/1989
- SIGMA FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CRD#: 14303) :: 11/13/1984 – 2/10/1987
- SENTRY EQUITY SERVICES, INC. (CRD#: 5069) :: 8/22/1984 – 12/5/1984
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including James David Reisinger, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report James Reisinger
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
James David Reisinger – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (1275258) for the broker – James David Reisinger
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.